Criminal law Special part practical

ANSWERS 42414
1. Zverev caught a nine-year-old girl on the outskirts of the village, raped, and then killed her and gouged out her eyes….
1) clause "k" part 2 of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
2) Part 1 of Art. 131 and part 1 of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
3) clause "d", part 2 of Art. 131 and p. "D" Part 2 of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
4) clause "c" part 3 of Art. 131 and p. "K" part 2 of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
5) clause "c" part 3 of Art. 131, item "k" part 2 of Art. 105 and part 1 of Art. 244 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;

2. Obstetrician Petrov, who gave birth to Martynova. I saw that the child was born with an exposed spinal cord, hydrocephalus and deformity of the legs ... ..
1) there is no corpus delicti in their actions, since the child was born with diseases incompatible with life;
2) Petrov must be held liable under clause "v.zh" Part 2 of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and Martynov - under Part 5 of Art. 33 and p. "V.zh" part 2 of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
3) Petrov must be held liable under clause "Article. Zh ”part 2 of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and Martynov - under Art. 106 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
4) Petrov must be held liable under Part 1 of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and Martynova is not subject to criminal liability, since she did not kill the child;
5) Petrov has no corpus delicti, since he acted with the consent of Martynova, and the latter should be held liable under clause "v.zh", part 2 of Art. 105 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;

3. Vladislavlev, knowing from a conversation with colleagues at work that the shift foreman Myrin, with whom they were in hostile relations, was serving imprisonment for stealing someone else's property, at a meeting of a team of employees said that thieves and swindlers like Myrin have no moral right to lead honest people and the common cause will not lead to good "...
1) Part 2 of Art. 129 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
2) Part 2 of Art. 129 and part 2 of Art. 130 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
3) Part 2 of Art. 130 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
4) Part 1 of Art. 137 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
5) there is no corpus delicti of any crime in Vladislavlev's actions;

4. After a divorce from his wife, Nikolaev for a long time (within 8 months) did not allocate funds for the maintenance of the child according to the writ of execution, often changing places of residence and work ... ..
1) yes, since Nikolaev's actions fall under the signs of a crime under Part 1 of Art. 157 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
2) no, since Nikolaev's actions contain signs of evasion from paying alimony, but they are not malicious;
3) no, since Nikolaev is not the child's parent;
4) no, since Nikolaev divorced his wife;
5) no, since Nikolaev adopted the child, and then divorced and is not obliged to support someone else's child;

5. The Sukhov family had three daughters. When Sukhov took his wife to the hospital for the fourth time, he said that there was no need for a fourth daughter, he threatened to “settle the whole family” ...
1) there is no corpus delicti in their actions, since they were in a state of extreme necessity;
2) both are subject to liability under Art. 153 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation;
3) to liability under Art. 153 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Sukhova should be involved;
4) to liability under Art. 153 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Panteleeva should be involved;