Logic test
Replenishment date: 18.10.2013
Content: 31018164744550.doc (96.5 KB)
️Automatic issue of goods ✔️
️Automatic issue of goods ✔️
Sales:
1
Refunds:
0
Reviews:
0
Views:
117
Description
1. Choose the correct answer to the question and mark it on the answer sheet.
Question 1. Which of the following categories relate to the subject of science "Logic"
1. Forms and means of thought necessary for rational knowledge in any field of knowledge.
2. Forms and laws of correct thinking.
3. Laws and forms, methods and operations of thinking, with the help of which a person learns the world around him.
4. Forms of sensory cognition.
5. The structure of thought.
Question 2. What expressions denote forms of sensory cognition
1. Emotions.
2. Representations, perceptions.
3. Experiences.
4. Mood.
5. Thinking.
Question 3. What expressions do not denote a form of logical thinking
1. Concept.
2. Judgments.
3. Theories.
4. Inferences.
5. There is no correct answer.
Question 4. Which of the above statements reveals the concept of “representation”
1. This is a form of mediated and generalized reflection of reality.
2. This is a form of thinking, which reflects the essential features of objects.
3. This is a sensory image of an object that was previously perceived in one form or another, but which is currently absent.
4. This is a form of visual perception of an object.
5. This is a form of generalized perception of the world.
Question 5. In what statements are the features of abstract thinking noted
1. Non-objective perception of the surrounding world.
2. Inseparable connection with the language.
3. Reflection of the world and its transformation.
4. The optimal form of knowledge of the world.
5. The correct answer is 1,3.
EXERCISE 2.
1. Choose the correct answer to the question and mark it on the answer sheet.
Question 1. What logical law is violated in the given example
The medicine taken by the sick is good. The more good you do, the better. This means that you need to take as many medicines as possible.
1. The law of identity.
2. The law of the excluded third.
3. The law of sufficient reason.
4. The law of consistency.
5. The law of denial of denial.
Question 2. Which of the above statements does not violate the law of identity
1. He sat on a horse with a broken leg for a long time.
2. Correctly say that the language will bring to Kiev. And I got a smoked tongue yesterday. Now they can safely go to Kiev.
3. The old sea wolf is really a wolf. All wolves live in the forest. Thus, old sea wolves live in the forest.
4. If the snow is white, then it is white.
5. Due to absent-mindedness, a chess player has repeatedly lost points in tournaments.
Question 3. In which of the above paired examples the law of consistency is violated
1. In autumn, rain is good for mushrooms. - In autumn, rain is not good for picking up mushrooms.
2. Kama is a tributary of the Volga. - The Kama is not a tributary of the Volga.
3. Kolya Ivanov - first-class athlete in running. - Kolya Ivanov is not a tennis player.
4. Some officers are generals. - Some officers are not generals.
5. All students in the group prepared for the logic test. - None of the students
group did not prepare for the logic test.
Question 4. Which of the following pairs of concepts does not apply to the law of the excluded third
1. Literate - illiterate.
2. The believer is an atheist.
3. A believer is an unbeliever.
4. Savvy - unwise.
5. Provable - Unprovable.
Question 5. In which of these judgments the law of sufficient reason is not violated
1. I categorically reject that I am a petty hooligan, since I am a person with a higher education.
2. Snow is falling. Winter has come.
3. The sun rises, so the morning comes.
4. The right eye itches - to rejoice, the left - to cry.
5. Student N. should be given credit, since he is leaving on a business trip.
EXERCISE 3.
3. Choose the correct answer to the question and mark it on the answer sheet.
Question 1. Which of the above definitions refers to the concept.
1. This is the abstraction of signs from the subject and their transformation into an object of independent consideration.
2. An integral set of judgments, i.e. thoughts in which something is asserted about the distinctive features of the object under study, the core of which are judgments about the most general and
Question 1. Which of the following categories relate to the subject of science "Logic"
1. Forms and means of thought necessary for rational knowledge in any field of knowledge.
2. Forms and laws of correct thinking.
3. Laws and forms, methods and operations of thinking, with the help of which a person learns the world around him.
4. Forms of sensory cognition.
5. The structure of thought.
Question 2. What expressions denote forms of sensory cognition
1. Emotions.
2. Representations, perceptions.
3. Experiences.
4. Mood.
5. Thinking.
Question 3. What expressions do not denote a form of logical thinking
1. Concept.
2. Judgments.
3. Theories.
4. Inferences.
5. There is no correct answer.
Question 4. Which of the above statements reveals the concept of “representation”
1. This is a form of mediated and generalized reflection of reality.
2. This is a form of thinking, which reflects the essential features of objects.
3. This is a sensory image of an object that was previously perceived in one form or another, but which is currently absent.
4. This is a form of visual perception of an object.
5. This is a form of generalized perception of the world.
Question 5. In what statements are the features of abstract thinking noted
1. Non-objective perception of the surrounding world.
2. Inseparable connection with the language.
3. Reflection of the world and its transformation.
4. The optimal form of knowledge of the world.
5. The correct answer is 1,3.
EXERCISE 2.
1. Choose the correct answer to the question and mark it on the answer sheet.
Question 1. What logical law is violated in the given example
The medicine taken by the sick is good. The more good you do, the better. This means that you need to take as many medicines as possible.
1. The law of identity.
2. The law of the excluded third.
3. The law of sufficient reason.
4. The law of consistency.
5. The law of denial of denial.
Question 2. Which of the above statements does not violate the law of identity
1. He sat on a horse with a broken leg for a long time.
2. Correctly say that the language will bring to Kiev. And I got a smoked tongue yesterday. Now they can safely go to Kiev.
3. The old sea wolf is really a wolf. All wolves live in the forest. Thus, old sea wolves live in the forest.
4. If the snow is white, then it is white.
5. Due to absent-mindedness, a chess player has repeatedly lost points in tournaments.
Question 3. In which of the above paired examples the law of consistency is violated
1. In autumn, rain is good for mushrooms. - In autumn, rain is not good for picking up mushrooms.
2. Kama is a tributary of the Volga. - The Kama is not a tributary of the Volga.
3. Kolya Ivanov - first-class athlete in running. - Kolya Ivanov is not a tennis player.
4. Some officers are generals. - Some officers are not generals.
5. All students in the group prepared for the logic test. - None of the students
group did not prepare for the logic test.
Question 4. Which of the following pairs of concepts does not apply to the law of the excluded third
1. Literate - illiterate.
2. The believer is an atheist.
3. A believer is an unbeliever.
4. Savvy - unwise.
5. Provable - Unprovable.
Question 5. In which of these judgments the law of sufficient reason is not violated
1. I categorically reject that I am a petty hooligan, since I am a person with a higher education.
2. Snow is falling. Winter has come.
3. The sun rises, so the morning comes.
4. The right eye itches - to rejoice, the left - to cry.
5. Student N. should be given credit, since he is leaving on a business trip.
EXERCISE 3.
3. Choose the correct answer to the question and mark it on the answer sheet.
Question 1. Which of the above definitions refers to the concept.
1. This is the abstraction of signs from the subject and their transformation into an object of independent consideration.
2. An integral set of judgments, i.e. thoughts in which something is asserted about the distinctive features of the object under study, the core of which are judgments about the most general and