Civil law control part 1,2
Replenishment date: 17.09.2013
Content: 30917165445390.rtf (121.24 KB)
️Automatic issue of goods ✔️
️Automatic issue of goods ✔️
Sales:
1
Refunds:
0
Reviews:
0
Views:
181
Description
control work
in the discipline "Civil law" (part 1).
Question 1. The concept and general characteristics of civil law. Property and non-property relations.
Question 2. Subjects of civil law. Individuals and legal entities.
Question 3. The concept of transactions in civil law.
Question 4. Ways of origin and termination of property rights.
Question 5. The concept and methods of ensuring the fulfillment of obligations.
Question 6. Task:
K. purchased the violin, but the seller Z. refused to hand over its case, referring to the fact that his dog was sleeping in it. Will the court satisfy K.'s demand for the transfer of the case to him if he goes to court with a corresponding claim?
Question 7. Task:
Semina, whose husband abused alcoholic beverages, appealed to the court with a demand to limit his legal capacity. At the same time, she asked the court to invalidate the deal recently made by her husband in a state of intoxication. In her absence, the husband sold a tea set to a neighbor and drank the money.
1. Are there grounds to satisfy Semina's demands?
2. What significance for the case will be the fact of the transaction confirmed by the medical institution in a state of strong intoxication?
Question 8. Task:
Draw up a draft letter to be sent by the seller of the share to the other participants in the shared ownership, about the intention to sell his share to an outsider.
Question 9. Assignment:
Make a diagram of "Methods for Enforcing Obligations".
Question 10. Task:
Harutyunyan filed a lawsuit against the Department of Municipal Housing to invalidate the contract for the transfer of housing. In the statement of claim, she indicated that, according to the contract of transfer of ownership, the apartment was transferred to the common property of her family, namely her, her husband and two minor children. At the time of filing the claims, their family broke up, and in this regard, it became necessary to exchange living space. Harutyunyan explained that during the paperwork for privatization she was not told that she would not be able to exchange the living space in the future.
1. Is this agreement concluded under the influence of delusion?
2. Is it essential that Harutyunyan cannot exchange the living space?
3. Does the court recognize this agreement as invalid?
in the discipline "Civil law" (part 1).
Question 1. The concept and general characteristics of civil law. Property and non-property relations.
Question 2. Subjects of civil law. Individuals and legal entities.
Question 3. The concept of transactions in civil law.
Question 4. Ways of origin and termination of property rights.
Question 5. The concept and methods of ensuring the fulfillment of obligations.
Question 6. Task:
K. purchased the violin, but the seller Z. refused to hand over its case, referring to the fact that his dog was sleeping in it. Will the court satisfy K.'s demand for the transfer of the case to him if he goes to court with a corresponding claim?
Question 7. Task:
Semina, whose husband abused alcoholic beverages, appealed to the court with a demand to limit his legal capacity. At the same time, she asked the court to invalidate the deal recently made by her husband in a state of intoxication. In her absence, the husband sold a tea set to a neighbor and drank the money.
1. Are there grounds to satisfy Semina's demands?
2. What significance for the case will be the fact of the transaction confirmed by the medical institution in a state of strong intoxication?
Question 8. Task:
Draw up a draft letter to be sent by the seller of the share to the other participants in the shared ownership, about the intention to sell his share to an outsider.
Question 9. Assignment:
Make a diagram of "Methods for Enforcing Obligations".
Question 10. Task:
Harutyunyan filed a lawsuit against the Department of Municipal Housing to invalidate the contract for the transfer of housing. In the statement of claim, she indicated that, according to the contract of transfer of ownership, the apartment was transferred to the common property of her family, namely her, her husband and two minor children. At the time of filing the claims, their family broke up, and in this regard, it became necessary to exchange living space. Harutyunyan explained that during the paperwork for privatization she was not told that she would not be able to exchange the living space in the future.
1. Is this agreement concluded under the influence of delusion?
2. Is it essential that Harutyunyan cannot exchange the living space?
3. Does the court recognize this agreement as invalid?