Environmental law
Replenishment date: 20.03.2020
Content: Environmental law.rar (16.94 КБ)
️Automatic issue of goods ✔️
️Automatic issue of goods ✔️
Sales:
7
Refunds:
0
Reviews:
0
Views:
210
Description
Tasks for control works
The 1 situation
The Japanese tanker "Tacoma" spilled 50 tons of oil in the Manchester shipping canal. The oil spill was not reported to the administration, so the canal was not closed and the oil was not removed from the water surface in a timely manner. During the passage of twin-engine boats through the channel, the oil caught fire, and six people died in the blaze. The local prosecutor's office opened a criminal case against the tanker captain. Are the actions of the prosecutor's office legal?
The 2 situation
The Russian tanker Bryansky Rabochy spilled 100 liters of oil in the Canadian port of Cartier. The captain of the tanker immediately informed the port administration about this and began to clean up the spill. However, Canadian coastal authorities took action to hijack the vessel and tow it to another location. Are the actions of the port administration legal?
The 3 situation
The Finnish tanker "Suomi" allowed an emergency discharge of 100 tons of oil in the port of Istanbul (Turkey). The captain of the tanker notified the administration of the incident and took emergency measures to eliminate the consequences of the accident. However, there was a threat of oil ignition. Under these conditions, the Turkish authorities, without consulting the captain of the tanker, took an action to forcibly tow the tanker out of the port. Are the actions of the port administration legal?
The 4 situation
While the ship "Alexander Pushkin" was in the Canadian port, the port water area was polluted with oil. The port administration blamed the ship's captain for the incident and filed a lawsuit against him, demanding compensation for the damage caused. As evidence, the port administration presented to the court photographs, in some of which a trace of oil products was clearly visible, but the vessel itself was not visible. The captain of the ship did not agree with the charges against him. What decision should the court make?
The 5 situation
As a result of the emission of harmful substances into the atmosphere, which occurred through the fault of the chief engineer of the chemical plant, the forest area located nearby was polluted. During the proceedings, it became clear that the release occurred as a result of a gross violation of technological discipline. The administrative commission of the local government imposed an administrative penalty on the chief engineer, and also filed a lawsuit in court demanding compensation for damage caused to the forest. The court satisfied the plaintiff's claims.
Determine the degree of legal responsibility of the chief engineer for the committed environmental offense.
The 6 situation
The police detained citizen G. while trying to dump garbage on the territory of the urban forest. In the course of the proceedings it turned out that before the moment of his arrest, citizen G. had repeatedly dumped garbage and other household waste in the territory of the forest, which led to the clogging and littering of its individual sections. The administrative commission of the municipality imposed an administrative penalty on citizen G. with the requirement to compensate the damage caused to the forest.
Determine the measure of legal responsibility of citizen G. for the committed environmental offense.
The 7 situation
Citizen L., while relaxing in the forest with his family, made a fire and did not extinguish it before leaving. As a result, the forest caught fire, and irreparable damage was caused to the forest. A criminal case was initiated and the court found citizen L. guilty of committing an environmental crime.
Define the measure of legal responsibility of citizen L. for the committed environmental offense.
The 8 situation
Citizen Z. was detained by employees of the internal affairs bodies while checking his personal vehicles. It turned out that citizen Z. was engaged in illegal hunting (did not have the appropriate permission), and he did it on the territory of the reserve and was aware of the unlawfulness of the act. A criminal case was opened and the court found citizen 3. guilty of committing an environmental crime.
Determine the measure of legal
The 1 situation
The Japanese tanker "Tacoma" spilled 50 tons of oil in the Manchester shipping canal. The oil spill was not reported to the administration, so the canal was not closed and the oil was not removed from the water surface in a timely manner. During the passage of twin-engine boats through the channel, the oil caught fire, and six people died in the blaze. The local prosecutor's office opened a criminal case against the tanker captain. Are the actions of the prosecutor's office legal?
The 2 situation
The Russian tanker Bryansky Rabochy spilled 100 liters of oil in the Canadian port of Cartier. The captain of the tanker immediately informed the port administration about this and began to clean up the spill. However, Canadian coastal authorities took action to hijack the vessel and tow it to another location. Are the actions of the port administration legal?
The 3 situation
The Finnish tanker "Suomi" allowed an emergency discharge of 100 tons of oil in the port of Istanbul (Turkey). The captain of the tanker notified the administration of the incident and took emergency measures to eliminate the consequences of the accident. However, there was a threat of oil ignition. Under these conditions, the Turkish authorities, without consulting the captain of the tanker, took an action to forcibly tow the tanker out of the port. Are the actions of the port administration legal?
The 4 situation
While the ship "Alexander Pushkin" was in the Canadian port, the port water area was polluted with oil. The port administration blamed the ship's captain for the incident and filed a lawsuit against him, demanding compensation for the damage caused. As evidence, the port administration presented to the court photographs, in some of which a trace of oil products was clearly visible, but the vessel itself was not visible. The captain of the ship did not agree with the charges against him. What decision should the court make?
The 5 situation
As a result of the emission of harmful substances into the atmosphere, which occurred through the fault of the chief engineer of the chemical plant, the forest area located nearby was polluted. During the proceedings, it became clear that the release occurred as a result of a gross violation of technological discipline. The administrative commission of the local government imposed an administrative penalty on the chief engineer, and also filed a lawsuit in court demanding compensation for damage caused to the forest. The court satisfied the plaintiff's claims.
Determine the degree of legal responsibility of the chief engineer for the committed environmental offense.
The 6 situation
The police detained citizen G. while trying to dump garbage on the territory of the urban forest. In the course of the proceedings it turned out that before the moment of his arrest, citizen G. had repeatedly dumped garbage and other household waste in the territory of the forest, which led to the clogging and littering of its individual sections. The administrative commission of the municipality imposed an administrative penalty on citizen G. with the requirement to compensate the damage caused to the forest.
Determine the measure of legal responsibility of citizen G. for the committed environmental offense.
The 7 situation
Citizen L., while relaxing in the forest with his family, made a fire and did not extinguish it before leaving. As a result, the forest caught fire, and irreparable damage was caused to the forest. A criminal case was initiated and the court found citizen L. guilty of committing an environmental crime.
Define the measure of legal responsibility of citizen L. for the committed environmental offense.
The 8 situation
Citizen Z. was detained by employees of the internal affairs bodies while checking his personal vehicles. It turned out that citizen Z. was engaged in illegal hunting (did not have the appropriate permission), and he did it on the territory of the reserve and was aware of the unlawfulness of the act. A criminal case was opened and the court found citizen 3. guilty of committing an environmental crime.
Determine the measure of legal