Current problems of civil law Result.+ Computer

Lastochkin and his nephew decided to go fishing. Arriving at the lake, Lastochkin bought fishing rods from a nearby store. However, when, having settled down on the shore, they were preparing to fish, they discovered that the fishing rods did not move apart. The company went back to the store to exchange fishing rods for others. The seller asked to see a receipt. After rummaging through his pockets, Lastochkin realized with horror that the check had been lost. The nephew claimed that the contract for the purchase of fishing rods had been concluded. The store seller objected to the replacement of fishing rods because the written form of the contract was not observed, and therefore witness testimony cannot be relied upon to confirm the conclusion of the contract. Is the seller correct about the consequences of not complying with a simple written retail purchase agreement?
The law office “Stasov, Spasovich, Urusov and Partners” received an appeal from the construction company “MIG-Development”, in which the developer asks to prepare a legal opinion on the following problem. By agreement of the parties, an easement was established between the developer and the owner of the neighboring land plot, providing the right of passage to the developer’s land plot. The monthly fee was 113 rubles. Due to the fact that the developer built a bypass road to his own land plot, the need for an easement disappeared, and he turned to the owner of the neighboring plot with a request to terminate the easement. The owner of the land plot refused to terminate the agreement to establish an easement, citing the fact that, in accordance with Art. 000 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, only at the request of the owner of a land plot encumbered with an easement, the easement can be terminated due to the disappearance of the grounds on which it was established. Please comment on this situation. Can the easement be terminated in this situation?
A purchase and sale agreement for two warehouse premises was concluded and executed between the public joint stock company PJSC Femida (seller) and the limited liability company Artdeco LLC (buyer). Based on the nullity of this agreement, PJSC "Femida" filed a claim with the arbitration court against LLC "Artdeko" to recover from its illegal possession the warehouse premises transferred in pursuance of the agreement. What type of defense is being discussed in the case?
Gorshkov agreed with a team of workers to build a garage. The garage was built on time, but Gorshkov, upon accepting the work, discovered several significant shortcomings and demanded that the work be re-done free of charge, the built garage be dismantled and a new one built, since he believed that eliminating the shortcomings would not lead to the result he was striving for. Determine the type of obligations that arose between Gorshkov and the team of workers in the task. Who is right in the dispute that has arisen?
The buyer, having discovered a defect in the purchased product, demanded that the seller replace it. However, the seller refused to satisfy the buyer's request on the grounds that the buyer did not have a receipt confirming the fact of purchase. In response to the seller's objection, the buyer brought a friend to the store as a witness, with whom he bought the product. However, this action of the buyer turned out to be unconvincing for the seller, and he did not change his negative answer. Did the buyer lawfully use witness testimony as evidence of the conclusion of the retail purchase and sale agreement?
Joint Stock Company (JSC) Stankoservis (general contractor) and JSC Prochnost MK (subcontractor) entered into a subcontract agreement for the installation of mechanical, electrical and other equipment in the plant building under construction. According to the terms of the contract, payment for work by the general contractor to the subcontractor must be made no later than within 10 days after acceptance of the result of the work. Proper completion of the work is confirmed by the acceptance certificate signed by the parties. Despite this, the work was not paid on time. The subcontractor filed a claim with the arbitration court for payment by the general contractor for the work performed.